Volume 7, No. 11                   www.foac-pac.org                   November 3, 2007

 

Firearms Owners Against Crime

 

"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom, must, like men, undergo the fatigues of supporting it." – Thomas Paine, (“The Crisis, 1777”)

 

 

E-Newsletter & FOAC Meeting Notice

November 4, 2007

 

Meeting Agenda Issues Covered-

 

Invited Guest Speakers:

·        None

7.0     Treasurers Report

7.1     Presentation of the past month’s report

8.0     Old Business

8.1              None

9.0 NEW BUSINESS

9.1              Voter’s Guide Approval

9.2              Harrisburg developments and legislative review

9.3              Judiciary Committee Hearings (Past, Present and Future)

9.3.1        Fall Anti-Gun Offensive Plans

9.3.2        Lobbying & Education Day – October 23rd

9.4              Pro-Gun Agenda Developments

9.5              Political Events Review and Summary

9.6              Membership committee developments

Federal issues:

9.7              HR 2640 & Public Debate / Issues

 

**Upcoming Gun Show:  November 17th & 18th (PGCA - Harmarville)

 

For more information on FOAC efforts to ‘Protect YOUR Rights’, THE MOST CURRENT VOTER’S GUIDES, donating to or becoming a member of FOAC please click on this link: http://www.foac-pac.org/

 

FOAC - 2007 Meeting Schedule

Jan 14, 2nd Sunday, Feb 11, 2nd Sunday, Mar 11, 2nd Sunday, Apr 15, 3rd Sunday, May 6, 1st Sunday, Jun 10, 2nd Sunday, Jul 8, 2nd Sunday, Aug 12, 2nd Sunday, Sep 9, 2nd Sunday, Oct 14, 2nd Sunday, Nov 4, 1st Sunday, Dec 9, 2nd Sunday

**Time of Meeting:  10:00 AM

**Location: Whitehall Borough Bldg (off Rt.51 – ask for directions)

****Coffee and Donuts will be provided

***Primary Election -- May 15 (Results Finalized)

***General Election -- Nov. 6 (Pending)

 

 

Election 2008

 

Unofficial early election returns are extremely promising!  Of the statewide candidates in races that FOAC is involved in all but one appear to be victorious.  In the Supreme Court races Judge Seamus McCaffery was the top vote getter in the state with a very tight race being waged between Debra Todd and Maureen Lally Green.  Unfortunately it appears that the revisionist Debra Todd is going to win the election by a very slim margin of less than 2%.  In the Superior Court races the two candidates endorsed by FOAC, Jackie Shogan and Cheryl Allen, have both won their respective seats for the Superior Court.  In the retention elections for Supreme Court and Superior Court both Tom Saylor and Joan Orie Melvin handily won reelection.

 

In the County races it appears that fortune has again shown on gun owners in a number of counties with FOAC candidates either winning by a slim majority or surprisingly trumping incumbent candidates.  For instance the race for Berks County Sheriff resulted in a narrow victory for FOAC endorsed Eric Weaknecht.  In both Butler and Washington counties FOAC candidates won surprising victories over the incumbent district attorney’s with pro-gun candidates, Richard Goldinger and Steve Toprani respectively, winning in both races.  These types of returns are coming in from many counties although results will have to be finalized and certified.

 

Perhaps the most troubling outcome of this election is that participation by citizens has fallen even more to what many observers are reporting a level of only 15% turnout.  While this does allow gun owners to increase their impact on elections throughout the Commonwealth it does not bode well for the future of our republic if weather and other mundane issues deter citizens from exercising this franchise and responsibility.

 

PA Legislative Battles Over Gun Control Continue (November)

Allegheny County Sportsmen’s League—Legislative Committee

 

Last month we reported on potential developments with certain bills being advanced that presented moderate gun control concepts to appease certain more radical legislator elements within the Pennsylvania House of Representatives.  On October 31 the Pennsylvania Judiciary Committee voted two bills out of committee.

 

The first bill was House Bill 784 which in it’s original form was unacceptable and as a result of requests put to the prime sponsor of the bill, Representative Scott Petri, Harry Schneider in Kim Stolfer were able to successfully rewrite this legislation with the cooperation of several volunteer attorneys, notably Mike McCormick, to put together a more refined and polish language that will focus the intent of the bill.

 

The other bill that was passed out of committee was House Bill 1744.  As a result of earlier testimony before the Judiciary Committee this Bill was deemed by sportsmen and gun owner representatives as unacceptable in its current form.  Our complaints generated a number of amendments that were to supposedly moderate our concerns. Unfortunately the process leading up to this vote did not allow for an open exchange of ideas even though the offer was made with Representative Tom Caltagirone to assist in determining what could be done to improve this legislation and to remove our concerns.  In fact several of the amendments were not even available for review until the morning of the committee vote which is an unacceptable situation.  One of the amendments amounts to, in my view, a political payoff for support by giving the NRA taxpayer subsidies to establish 'Eddie Eagle' in Pennsylvania school districts.  What is worse yet is that this ‘Firearms Education Fund’ does not mandate the use of ‘Eddie Eagle’ by use of the language “such as” to describe the entity doing the training so now we are opening up the entire PA school system to proselytizing at the expense of the PA taxpayers.  For instance the Brady group uses a program called ‘Star’ that is 90% political advocacy for kids to lobby legislators to support gun control.  This is a stupid, stupid move and the long term consequences could be disastrous.

 

This legislation is scheduled for a vote next week and we are asking ALL gun owners to notify their legislators to support House Bill 784 and to OPPOSE House Bill 1744.  We are going to be asking the statewide gun owner and sportsmen’s groups to join with us in this effort.  If you would like copies of the legislation and the votes in the Judiciary Committee please e-mail your request.  Also, please forward any comment that your legislator makes on this legislation to us so that we can respond properly.  More to come!

 

Federal Legislative Update:

HR 2640 -- NICS Update Bill

The bill which provides for an update of mental health records available to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) is being blocked in the Senate by a single lawmaker who says the provisions of the so-called "NICS Im­provement Act" will cost too much and in­terfere with Second Amendment rights.

The bill, which has passed the House on a voice vote, has bipartisan backing and support from both the National Rifle Asso­ciation and the Brady Campaign Against Gun Violence. It is designed to improve the federal system for checking gun buyers' mental health history in order to block pur­chases by those diagnosed as mentally ill.

The lawmaker who put the hold on the bill, Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK), contends that the bill would create "a pathway by which individuals can lose their Second Amendment rights but no pathway through which they can gain them back if they're stable. I believe individual rights should be guaranteed," Coburn said.

Coburn is even more concerned about the cost, which he contends would run to $2 billion over the next several years. Such legislation "is growing the government without decreasing it somewhere else," he said. He is backed by the American Legion, whose leadership said in a statement that the law "could have the unintended con­sequence of denying gun rights to any vet­eran, especially wartime veterans, with­out the benefit of due process." Gun Own­ers of America is also against the bill. The New GUN WEEK, November 15, 2007

 

Bishop Provision Protects Firearms

The US House of Representatives on Oct. 24 passed by a 344-71 vote an amendment sponsored by Congress­man Rob Bishop (R-UT) that will en­sure there will be no federal infringe­ment of Second Amendment rights on certain public lands.

The provision, which came in the form of the Republican motion to recom­mit on HR-1483, a bill to expand and create certain National Heritage Areas, stipulates that all designated lands within these areas would be exclusively governed by state and local laws regard­ing hunting, fishing, and the possession or use of a weapon, trap, or net. The bill now heads to the US Senate. The New GUN WEEK, November 15, 2007

 

NEWS RELEASES:

 

Senate Considering Treaty That Could Affect Gun Rights

Ask your Senators to support the "Second Amendment Protection" Amendment

Gun Owners of America

E-Mail Alert

8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102,

Springfield, VA 22151

Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408

http://www.gunowners.org

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

It turns out that Washington might soon be giving an arm of the United Nations jurisdiction over the import, export, and oceanic transport of GUNS and AMMUNITION.

You would think that even Washington politicians would not be so stupid as to give people like Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Burma's despotic military junta, the Sudan's genocidal strongmen, or Cuba's Fidel Castro the right to interfere with our Second Amendment rights on American soil, right?

Well, what makes sense to the common person isn't always the reality in Washington.

The Senate Foreign Relations committee will soon be debating the ratification of a treaty that bears the appropriate acronym of LOST (Law of the Sea Treaty).  LOST would put the ocean's resources in the hands of the UN's International Seabed Authority -- and yes, that spells trouble for our Second Amendment rights.

First, there are concerns that the International Seabed Authority might close firing ranges based on the bogus argument that runoff from these ranges pollutes the world's oceans.

This battle over lead run-off is one that gun owners have already fought in this country.  We shudder to think that we could one day find ourselves fighting this battle at the global level as well!

But, even more frightening, Article 88 of the treaty stipulates that the high seas are "reserved" for peaceful purposes.  And this provision would be enforced by the Tribunal on the Law of the Sea.

What does this mean?  It clearly doesn't mean that the U.S. or any other country is going to shut down its navy.  But, on the other hand, it would be foolish to assume that the UN will not eventually try to use this provision to prohibit the oceanic transport of all firearms and ammunition -- except, of course, for guns and ammo bound for murderous dictators. Make no mistake:  The United Nations is composed of hoards of heavily-armed genocidal tyrants.  And the last thing these people want is for firearms and ammunition to fall into the hands of "peons" like you and me.

And the UN has shown no reluctance to try to strip the U.S. of its sovereignty and interfere with our Second Amendment rights.  Just consider the several attempts they have made over the last decade to sucker the United States into a binding treaty that would call for greater gun control restrictions inside our own country.

Peter Leitner, who was the Representative to the Law of the Sea negotiations in Geneva during the 1970s and a key witness at the hearing before the Environment and Public Works Committee, is not only an authority on the LOST treaty, he is concerned about the danger it poses to individual rights.

He says, "The inherent danger in this Treaty is the fact that nothing is set in stone and broad matters of interpretation will be the province of the 'one-nation/one-vote' Assembly.  We will have no leverage, veto-power, etc., in that forum."  And then there's the term "Peaceful Purposes" in the treaty.  Leitner says that this is "one of those extraordinarily vague terms that lend themselves to political manipulation."

If the US can claim that LOST allows US ships to board foreign ships and look for weapons of mass destruction, he argues, "then other nations can interdict cargoes they find offensive as well.  I think the [Second Amendment] gun guys have a very legitimate concern!"

Another opponent of this treaty is John Bolton, the former US Ambassador to the United Nations.  Bolton almost single-handedly kept the US from signing onto anti-gun treaties sponsored by the UN.  Now he is making the rounds on Capitol Hill, reportedly lobbying conservative senators against LOST.

ACTION:  Write your senator.  Tell him not to vote to ratify the Law of the Sea Treaty until the following amendment is adopted:

Article 88 is amended by adding at the end thereof the following:

"Notwithstanding anything in this treaty to the contrary, no action shall be taken under this treaty which would impede the export, transport, or import of small arms and ammunition into the United States for the lawful exercise of Second Amendment rights under the Constitution of the United States."

You can use the pre-written message and send it as an e-mail by visiting the GOA Legislative Action Center at http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm (where phone and fax numbers are also available).

 

CCRKBA: Hillary Wants Drivers Licenses For Illegals, Opposes Carry Licenses For American Citizens

BELLEVUE, WANov. 2, 2007 – New York Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton supports giving drivers’ licenses to illegal aliens, but she opposes right-to-carry statutes that provide concealed carry licenses for law-abiding American citizens and others who are here legally, the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms said today.

“Based on her comments during Tuesday night’s debate,” said CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb, “Sen. Clinton must think people in this country illegally are entitled to greater rights than citizens and others who are here legally. Maybe it’s because she knows that illegal aliens would vote for her, while law-abiding American gun owners won’t.”

Gottlieb noted that Mrs. Clinton was the only presidential candidate, either Republican or Democrat, who ignored an invitation to appear at the recent Gun Rights Policy Conference in Ft. Mitchell, Kentucky, near Cincinnati. The annual conference is co-sponsored by CCRKBA and the Second Amendment Foundation.

“Every other candidate, both Republican and Democrat, either attended, called or sent their regrets that they could not attend,” Gottlieb said, “but Mrs. Clinton simply blew off the opportunity to speak to a representative cross-section of America’s 80 million gun-owning voters. Is it possible she doesn’t think she may need some of those 80 million votes, if she gets her party’s nomination?

“It is clear she wants special priveleges for illegal immigrants, yet she opposes allowing American citizens to carry firearms to protect themselves from illegal aliens and others who commit violent crimes,” he said.

“Since Hillary Clinton moved out of the White House early, so she could run for the Senate from New York as an obvious stepping stone toward her own run for the Oval Office,” Gottlieb stated, “she has supported every gun control measure to come along. She supports registration and licensing, she supports banning sport-utility rifles and magazine restrictions and she opposed legislation to prevent junk harassment lawsuits against the firearms industry.

“Hillary Clinton, like too many of her Democrat colleagues, has given mere lip service to gun owners with vague claims that she ‘supports’ the Second Amendment,” Gottlieb said. “It now appears that she is more interested in the welfare of people who don’t belong in this country, than in the civil rights of people who do belong here.”

-END-

 

News Briefs:

College ‘Empty Holster Protest’ Hits Campuses, Draws Attention

by Gun Week Staff

When Students for Concealed Carry on Campus (SCCC) announced their plans for a nationwide "Empty Holster Protest" on ever 100 college and university campuses across the country, it was largely intended to focus public attention on the danger and futility posed by the "gun free zones" cam­pus policy that pervades the academic com­munity in almost every state except Utah.

Coming almost exactly six months after the massacre of defenseless students and faculty at Virginia Tech University, the grassroots student effort was intended to stir a public dialog about legalizing guns on campus for students, teachers ail ad­ministrators who have been trained and legally licensed to carry concealed.

The protect spread across the campuses of America quietly during the third week of October, and from all indications, the "Empty Holster Protest" aimed at bring­ing awareness to the general public but particularly students and teachers about their vulnerability in so-called "gun free zones." Organizers say it is just the first step in an aggressive campaign to bring concealed carry to higher education.

SCCC is an independent grassroots or­ganization that formed just days after the Virginia Tech massacre in April-the pro­test involved students at universities, col­leges and community colleges all over the country. Pro-self-defense students carried empty holsters in Florida, Kentucky, Penn­sylvania, Oklahoma, Ohio and Washing­ton state for example.

And it created waves just about every­where, although many local news organi­zations seemed to ignore the protest, some major news outlets covered it in depth, in­cluding The Washington Times, the Fox News network and USA Today.

For example, the Oct. 23 edition of US News & World Report noted that "A num­ber of university administrators disagree (with the protest), saying guns can't pos­sibly make campuses safer, even wonder­ing whether the protest itself is disruptive or insensitive so soon after the Virgina Tech incident."

And Peter Hamm, a spokesman for the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, absurdly remarked, "You don't like the fact that you can't have a gun on your college campus? Drop out of school." Hamm's re­marks only seemed to fuel further media coverage for the students concerned about campus safety.

But on the other side of the argument, Mark Taff, executive director of the Citi­zens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (CCRKBA), and coincidentally a part-time student at Bellevue Commu­nity College (BCC) in Washington state, threw his full support to the effort. He even strolled around the BCC campus with an empty holster, wearing a T-shirt that said "Signs Can't Stop Acts of Violence" withla silhouette of a pistol covered by a red circle with a slash mark, depicting a "No Guns" sign, pockmarked by fake bullet holes. Taff went one step further, though, and posted signs at several spots around the campus that read "This Is A Gun Free Zone. If you were planning on shooting a bunch of in­nocent people and then yourself, we're sorry, but that is not allowed here."

The sign then explained to readers that they could learn about the empty holster ,protest by visiting ConcealedCampus.com.

"It is absurd to disarm legally-licensed citizens just because they happen to be on a university campus," Taff told Gun Week. "These are the very citizens who have dem­onstrated their clean background, and in many cases gone through mandatory train­ing, to qualify for a concealed carry license. They are not the people who perpetrate outrages like Virginia Tech. Indeed, they are the kind of people most likely to stop such incidents before they become massa­cres."

That sentiment was shared by Michael Flitcraft, a student at the University of Cincinnati, OH. He spoke during the re­cent Gun Rights Policy Conference, and was quoted by WKRC News in Cincinnati noting, "Obviously criminals don't pay at­tention to laws; that's why they're crimi­nals. So, taking innocent people and dis­arming them, leaves them no effective means of resistance to see their family at the end of the day."

Some other students disagreed, includ­ing sophomore Wes Kayser, who also at­tends the University of Cincinnati. He told the television news reporter, "It doesn't seem like the place where guns are needed, on campus ... that's what campus security is for in my opinion."

Campus Security Failed

Taff quickly observed that campus se­curity did not stop the Virginia Tech ram­page in which 32 students and teachers were killed, nor did it prevent a murder­-suicide earlier this year at the University of Washington campus in Seattle. How­ever, recalling the multiple shooting a few years ago at the Appalachian Law School in Virginia, Taff noted that the gunman in that incident was stopped and detained by two students who had rushed to their cars, retrieved handguns and confronted the suspect.

"The time has long since passed when the term 'gun-free school zone' should have been erased from the national vocabulary," Taff observed. "Such areas amount to vic­tim disarmament zones where would-be killers enjoy a target-rich environment in which they have no fear of-an intended victim shooting back."

He was working on organizing a chap­ter of Students for Concealed Carry on Campus at BCC.

Meanwhile, Internet gun rights activists have suggested that the Empty Holster Protest become an annual event.

"CCRKBA believes the National Empty Holster Protest will bring attention to a situation that anti-gun university admin­istrators want to ignore," Taff said. "So­-called gun free zones' have been complete failures and everyone knows it. It is time for a different approach, one that restores the right of every student and faculty member to fight back. That's why we sup­port this student-led effort to create re­sponsible, sensible policies where there is now a moral and rational void. Students and teachers at higher institutions deserve better than to continue living in the deadly environment of political correctness."

In related news, at least one university, Weber State University in Ogden, UT, a class in the school's Continuing Education Program is specifically aimed at getting people on and off campus to carry guns.

According to KSL, the NBC affiliate in Salt Lake City, classroom instructions are given by a professor of anthropology, who doubles as a concealed weapons instruc­tor. Ron Holt says, "I see carrying a con­cealed weapon as a kind of life insurance policy: 99.99 times you'll never need it, but if you ever do need it, you'll probably re­ally need it."

The Beehive State is the only one at present that allows carry on campus by students or instructors who have been legally licensed to carry in the state. The Weber State class is not for credit, and it's open to off-campus folks too, as long as they're at least 21 years old and meet legal requirements for a gun permit. The New GUN WEEK, November 15, 2007

 

Indicted Indiana Police Linked to 2004 Cop Shooting

Reporters at The South Bend Tribune in Indiana discovered that serial num­bers on guns involved in a complicated drug, fraud and firearms case against a local police officer and two former sheriff's deputies matched the serial numbers of guns mentioned in federal documents related to the shooting of a South Bend officer in 2004.

The revelation came in late October as news coverage intensified over the ar­rests of former St. Joseph County Depu­ties Andy Taghon and Ryan Huston, and South Bend Officer Jamie Buford on Oct. 22. Huston, Taghon and Buford face drug and fraud charges, according to WSBT news in South Bend, and Taghon also faces a charge of selling a stolen gun and selling a firearm to a felon.

In 2004, Police Cpl. Rick Ruszkowski was shot, and in connection with that case, a man named Willard King pleaded guilty to federal gun charges. The television station said the shooting occurred about the same time that Taghon apparently sold the firearms in question.

The three indicted lawmen allegedly targeted trailers containing cocaine and stolen goods between July 2004 and March 2005, while the owner of the trailers was in jail. The cops allegedly sold many of the stolen items on eBay, and got a convicted felon to peddle the cocaine.

Huston and Taghon were fired in July 2006 and Buford is on paid leave from the police department.

Also arrested in the case was a man identified as Daniel Alvarez, a convicted felon. He was allegedly solicited to sell the cocaine. The New GUN WEEK, November 15, 2007

 

Gunowners Face New UN Treaty Fight

by Joseph P. Tartaro Executive Editor

Britain, Japan, Australia and others are pushing for an unprecedented treaty regulating the arms trade world­wide, in a campaign sure to last years and to pit them against a determined foe: American gunowners, shoot­ers organizations worldwide, and, at present, the United States government.

The Associated Press (AP) noted at the end of Septem­ber, that in what United Nations (UN) officials say is an "overwhelming" response, almost 100 governments have submitted ideas for such a treaty, to be reviewed over the next year. There's an "extremely urgent" need for controls on the international gun trade, says Kenya, echo­ing the sentiment in much of guns-besieged Africa.

But in the US, according to AP, the National Rifle As­sociation (NRA) and other firearms civil rights groups say they see a creeping attempt to limit civilian gun own­ership within nations-even though the focus now is on setting standards for arms exports and imports.

The UN’s First Committee (Disarmament and Inter­national Security), in an organizational meeting on Oct. 8, adopted its program of work and agenda for the 62nd session of the General Assembly. The work program is split into three phases, with the first phase, from Oct. 8­

16, being a general debate on all disarmament and in­ternational security agenda items. The second phase, from Oct, 17-26, will be thematic discussions on all items, along with the introduction and consideration of draft resolutions and decisions. The final phase, lasting from Oct. 29-Nov. 2, will involve action on all draft texts.

Just before the First Committee began its meeting, leaders of the World Forum on the Future of Shooting Sports Activities (WFSA) held a strategy meeting in Italy regarding the new global gun control effort.

Earlier, Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon moved to re­vitalize the international disarmament agenda and the UN effectiveness in that area through the creation of a new Office for Disarmament Affairs and the appointment of Sergio Duarte as High Representative to lead it. That disarmament agenda covers everything from nuclear missiles to small arms including rifles and shotguns and pistols. He and others in the international community are pointed toward a binding treaty on regulating and policing global traffic in small arms by the year 2010.

The international issues "necessarily will come to in­volve at some point domestic laws and policies regard­ing firearms," said former Congressman Bob Barr (R-GA), a leading NRA voice on the subject, according to AP.

The NRA and other US gun lobbyists have helped blunt earlier efforts at the UN to rein in the weapons trade. Last December, the US delegation appointed by the Bush Administration cast the lone negative vote when 153 na­tions approved a General Assembly resolution initiating this new treaty process. If the November 2008 presiden­tial election produce a new administration disposed to support the UN treaty, gunowners may find themselves struggling to retain their firearms civil rights.

Now, alone among the world's top 10 arms suppliers, the US-by far the biggest, with almost $13 billion in arms export agreements in 2005 has not filed a re­quested report to the UN with its views on a treaty.

"The United States has not yet decided whether it will or will not participate in (the review), and thus we will have no submission at this time," Richard Kidd, a deputy assistant secretary of state, told Associated Press.

The treaty campaign may encounter resistance beyond Washington as well. The reports from Russia and China, two other big arms exporters, offered only lukewarm endorsement for stricter controls.

The United States and other industrialized countries generally keep close oversight on arms sales, but dozens of nations have no regulations specific to weapons ex­ports and imports. Only 37 nations, for example, have laws governing the operations of private arms brokers.  The New GUN WEEK, November 1, 2007

 

Schwarzenegger Signs Microstamp, Lead Ban Measures

California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger R) signed the Crime Gun Identification kct over the Oct. 12-14 weekend, and that means gun sellers by 2010-if there are my left in the state by that time-will nave to use "microstamping" technology on very semi-automatic pistol they sell, 'INSNews.com reported.

The new law, AB-1471, requires information about a pistol's make, model and identification number to be laser engraved onto the gun's firing pin. Theoretically, the information would transfer itself onto the Spent cartridge case when the pistol is fired, allowing police to match bullet cas­ings found at crime scenes with the gun that fired the bullet.

Gun control groups say the new law will help police solve crimes.

"We applaud Gov. Schwarzenegger for taking a bold step to solve gun murders in California," said Brady Campaign Presi­dent Paul Helmke. "This ground-breaking law gives police officers a powerful tool to apprehend armed criminals and gang mem­bers before they strike again," he added.

According to the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, Schwarzenegger `has set a new national standard for the rest of the country to follow." Those acco­lades mean that the Brady Campaign will now be using California's "microstamping" law as a model for other state legislatures.

Critics say the bill is back door gun con­trol. The National Shooting Sports Foun­dation (NSSF), the trade association of the firearms industry, accused Schwarzenegger of betraying law-abiding gunowners, retail­ers and hunters by signing the bill.

First of all the "microstamping" technol­ogy is "flawed," as indicated by multiple studies, the NSSF said in a news release. Among those negative studies were reports issued by California universities.

NSSF also said criminals will be able to remove the laser engraving in moments, using common household tools. And it would be easy for criminals to scatter microstamped cartridges from other guns at crime scenes to confuse police, critics say.

Some say the new law will dry up gun sales in California-and that may be the point:

"By signing the microstamping legisla­tion, Governor Schwarzenegger chose to disregard warnings that major firearms manufacturers would be forced to aban­don the California market altogether rather than bear the astronomical costs associated with reconfiguring the manu­facturing and assembly processes neces­sary for microstamping," NSSF said, ac­cording to CNSNews.

NSSF also noted that according to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), firearms used in crimes are mostly old guns-beyond the reach of microstamping legislation.

In another blow to Second Amendment supporters, Schwarzenegger also signed AB-821, a bill banning lead ammunition in certain hunting areas of the state.

Backed by "anti-hunting extremists," the measure is intended to save the Cali­fornia condor from lead poisoning-despite the fact that there is no conclusive scien­tific evidence that the birds are getting sick from ingesting ammunition fragments, NSSF said.  The New GUN WEEK, November 1, 2007

 

Albany Cops Got Machineguns, Some Reportedly Still Missing

From the ‘Only Cops Should Have Guns’ comes the news story out of Albany, NY, involving several automatic firearms obtained by officers-apparently “improperly” according to The Albany Times Union-and now it appears some of the guns are missing, despite a claim by the police chief that they had all been rounded up and destroyed.

The guns in question were acquired by Albany police and at least one private citizen in the early 1990s, the newspaper said. Police Chief James W. Tuffey said last month that dozens of guns had been se­cretly purchased by officers in the depart­ment, but they had been gathered up and destroyed. Sources at the newspaper re­portedly disputed that statement.

The chief reportedly apologized to the city council's Public Safety Committee in September when he acknowledged the purchases.

The guns were originally confiscated in 2001 and 2002 after an investigation, and at least 42 of the weapons were destroyed. But that didn't satisfy committee Chair­man James Scalzo, who told the newspa­per, "Those weapons could only have been purchased by a police department. No in­dividual officer or civilian could purchase those guns. They weren't used for police; they were used, it's my understanding, for gun enthusiasts who belonged to the po­lice department. He stated to us that they had all been recovered and destroyed."

The guns had apparently never been used in the line of duty. Now Albany offi­cials are wondering just what they were used for. When the newspaper asked for information under the Freedom of Infor­mation Act, the city argued that discuss­ing what kinds of firearms officers used might put them in danger.

One of the missing guns allegedly had been purchased by a sitting judge, and another was bought by a judge who is now retired. Both judges denied having ever re­ceived the guns, the newspaper said, and apparently the police chief is satisfied they didn't. Another of the guns was reportedly obtained by Albany County Assistant Dis­trict Attorney Brian Farley, but he turned it in four years ago.

The guns were purchased in 1993 and 1994 during the first Clinton Ad­ministration.

One of the guns was found during an investigation of a local gun store, B&J Guns. Another of the guns was found at a gun store in Texas. Other guns disap­peared, and some reportedly were taken home by individual officers, including some who had retired. The New GUN WEEK, November 1, 2007<